<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sabatini and Associates, LLC Attorneys at Law :: Newington :: Hartford :: Connecticut</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 02:13:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2011 Personal Injury Results</title>
		<link>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2011/12/15/2011-personal-injury-results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2011/12/15/2011-personal-injury-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 02:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Sabatini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2011 has been another great year for the firm&#8217;s personal injury practice and most importantly for the firm&#8217;s clients.  The law firm&#8217;s attorneys obtained notable settlement results including a $450,000.00 mild traumatic brain injury settlement, a $190,000.00 motor vehicle collision settlement, a $100,000.00 motor vehicle collision settlement involving a drunk driver, a $100,000.00 motor vehicle [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2011 has been another great year for the firm&#8217;s personal injury practice and most importantly for the firm&#8217;s clients.  The law firm&#8217;s attorneys obtained notable settlement results including a $450,000.00 mild traumatic brain injury settlement, a $190,000.00 motor vehicle collision settlement, a $100,000.00 motor vehicle collision settlement involving a drunk driver, a $100,000.00 motor vehicle collision settlement involving a drunk driver colliding into a pedestrian in a cross walk, a $100,000.00 settlement for a car accident victim, and a $190,000.00 settlement for a client injured by defective medication. The firm filed numerous personal injury lawsuits on behalf of clients including cases involving medical malpractice, slip and falls, defective products, car accidents, and others. New clients retained the firm in 2011 to investigate and pursue a variety of personal injury claims including defective hip implant claims, Actos claims, medical malpractice claims, dental malpractice claims, wrongful death claims as well as car accident and premises liability claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2011/12/15/2011-personal-injury-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Firm&#8217;s Notable Employment Litigation Results In 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2011/12/13/law-firms-notable-employment-litigation-results-in-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2011/12/13/law-firms-notable-employment-litigation-results-in-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 02:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Sabatini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2011, Sabatini and Associates, LLC achieved notable results in employment litigation.   The firm&#8217;s attorneys successfully settled numerous cases including a $410,000.00 age discrimination case against the United States, a $200,000.00 FMLA and ADA wrongful termination case, a $120,000.00 plus job reinstatement case involving disability discrimination, a $100,000.00 FMLA violation case, and a $50,000.00 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2011, Sabatini and Associates, LLC achieved notable results in employment litigation.   The firm&#8217;s attorneys successfully settled numerous cases including a $410,000.00 age discrimination case against the United States, a $200,000.00 FMLA and ADA wrongful termination case, a $120,000.00 plus job reinstatement case involving disability discrimination, a $100,000.00 FMLA violation case, and a $50,000.00 religious discrimination case. The firm was retained by numerous individuals for wrongful termination and discrimination cases. The firm filed CHRO complaints and lawsuits on behalf of clients alleging wrongful termination on the basis of age, race, national origin, pregnancy, gender, disability, sexual orientation, color, and religion.  The firm also filed suit in cases involving FMLA violations, sexual harassment, whistle-blowing and in cases involving discrimination and discharge for bring workers&#8217; compensation claims.  The firm continues to take on new clients and cases involving wrongful termination and discrimination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2011/12/13/law-firms-notable-employment-litigation-results-in-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$148,500 JUDGMENT</title>
		<link>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2011/01/25/148500-judgment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2011/01/25/148500-judgment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Sabatini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The law firm of Sabatini and Asociates today won a $148,500 judgment plus costs in a case against a new home building contractor. The case was initially tried in 2009, but the trial judge did not award all the damages claimed by the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs appealed and the Connecticut Supreme Court found error and remanded the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The law firm of Sabatini and Asociates today won a $148,500 judgment plus costs in a case against a new home building contractor. The case was initially tried in 2009, but the trial judge did not award all the damages claimed by the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs appealed and the Connecticut Supreme Court found error and remanded the case back for a new trial on damages only for breach of contract and breach of the New Home Warranty Act.  After hearing the trial court agreed with the plaintiffs and entered the correct judgment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2011/01/25/148500-judgment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massachusett&#8217;s Highest Court Voids Foreclosures on Two Homes</title>
		<link>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2011/01/07/massachusetts-highest-court-voids-foreclosures-on-two-homes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2011/01/07/massachusetts-highest-court-voids-foreclosures-on-two-homes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 17:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Sabatini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Massachusetts&#8217; highest court voided foreclosures on two homes because the banks that tried to take title failed to show they held the mortgages at the time of foreclosure. The ruling by the Supreme Judicial Court on Friday upheld a lower court ruling against U.S. Bancorp and Wells Fargo &#38; Co.  The ruling should have an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Massachusetts&#8217; highest court voided foreclosures on two homes because the banks that tried to take title failed to show they held the mortgages at the time of foreclosure. The ruling by the Supreme Judicial Court on Friday upheld a lower court ruling against U.S. Bancorp and Wells Fargo &amp; Co.  The ruling should have an effect on other foreclosure cases where the banks paperwork specifically with regards to establishing the owner of the mortgage is not legally adequate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2011/01/07/massachusetts-highest-court-voids-foreclosures-on-two-homes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1.2 Million Dollar Judgment Obtained</title>
		<link>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2010/03/05/1-2-million-dollar-judgment-obtained/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2010/03/05/1-2-million-dollar-judgment-obtained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 20:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Sabatini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2010/03/05/1-2-million-dollar-judgment-obtained/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sabatini and Associates, LLC represented the estate of a 38 year old women who was the victim of a cross over collision. The Superior Court in Connecticut entered judgment in favor of the estate for the sum of 1.2 Million Dollars]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sabatini and Associates, LLC represented the estate of a 38 year old women who was the victim of a cross over collision. The Superior Court in Connecticut entered judgment in favor of the estate for the sum of 1.2 Million Dollars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2010/03/05/1-2-million-dollar-judgment-obtained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retained in Corporate Dispute</title>
		<link>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2010/03/05/retained-in-corporate-dispute/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2010/03/05/retained-in-corporate-dispute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 20:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Sabatini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2010/03/05/retained-in-corporate-dispute/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The law firm of Sabatini and Associates, LLC was recently retained in a corporate dispute between a minority member and the Limited Liability Company. The firm represents the minority member who is being forced out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The law firm of Sabatini and Associates, LLC was recently retained in a corporate dispute between a minority member and the Limited Liability Company. The firm represents the minority member who is being forced out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2010/03/05/retained-in-corporate-dispute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toyota Halts Sales On 8 Recalled Vehicle Models</title>
		<link>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2010/01/26/toyota-halts-sales-on-8-recalled-vehicle-models/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2010/01/26/toyota-halts-sales-on-8-recalled-vehicle-models/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Sabatini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toyota is suspending U.S. sales of eight recalled vehicle models to fix accelerator pedals that stick. As part of the plan, Toyota is halting production at five manufacturing facilities for the week of Feb. 1 &#8220;to assess and coordinate activities.&#8221;  There are 2.3 million vehicles involved in the recall, which was announced last week. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toyota is suspending U.S. sales of eight recalled vehicle models to fix accelerator pedals that stick. As part of the plan, Toyota is halting production at five manufacturing facilities for the week of Feb. 1 &#8220;to assess and coordinate activities.&#8221;  There are 2.3 million vehicles involved in the recall, which was announced last week. The sales suspension includes the 2009-2010 RAV4, the 2009-2010 Corolla, the 2009-2010 Matrix, the 2005-2010 Avalon, the 2007-2010 Camry, the 2010 Highlander, the 2007-2010 Tundra and the 2008-2010 Sequoia. Toyota previously recalled 4.2 million vehicles due to gas pedals that could become trapped under floor mats, causing the vehicle to accelerate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2010/01/26/toyota-halts-sales-on-8-recalled-vehicle-models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whirpool Ordered To Pay Over 1 Million For Harassing A Black Female Worker</title>
		<link>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2009/12/29/whirpool-ordered-to-pay-over-1-million-for-harassing-a-black-female-worker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2009/12/29/whirpool-ordered-to-pay-over-1-million-for-harassing-a-black-female-worker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Sabatini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission recently obtained a court judgment of $1,073,261 against Whirlpool Corporation in a race and  sex discrimination lawsuit on behalf of Carlota Freeman, an African American  former employee at the company’s LeVergne, Tenn.-based facility.  According to the lawsuit, Whirlpool  failed to protect  Freeman from persistent harassment by a white male coworker, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission recently obtained a court judgment of $1,073,261 against Whirlpool Corporation in a race and  sex discrimination lawsuit on behalf of Carlota Freeman, an African American  former employee at the company’s LeVergne, Tenn.-based facility.  According to the lawsuit, Whirlpool  failed to protect  Freeman from persistent harassment by a white male coworker, which ultimately  resulted in her being physically assaulted by him.   The Court agreed.</p>
<p>Following a bench trial, Tennessee District Court Judge  John T. Nixon  awarded Freeman $773,261 in back pay and front pay, and  $300,000 in compensatory damages for non-pecuniary injuries – the maximum  allowed under federal law. During the  four-day trial, the evidence showed that Freeman reported escalating offensive  verbal conduct and gestures by the male coworker over a period of two months  before he physically assaulted her; four levels of Whirlpool’s management were  aware of the escalating harassment; Whirlpool failed to take effective steps to  stop the harassment; and, Freeman suffered devastating permanent mental  injuries that will prevent her from working again as a result of the assault  and Whirlpool’s failure to protect her.</p>
<p>In its defense, Whirlpool claimed that it had posted its anti-discrimination and harassment policies in the workplace and thereby relived itself from liability.  However, the court correctly  pointed out that when those charged with enforcing a policy don’t take that  responsibility seriously, an employer has not met its duty under Title VII to  prevent and stop illegal harassment in its workplace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2009/12/29/whirpool-ordered-to-pay-over-1-million-for-harassing-a-black-female-worker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CONVERSATION COMMISSION APPROVES WETLAND MAP AMENDMENT</title>
		<link>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2009/10/21/conversation-commission-approves-wetland-map-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2009/10/21/conversation-commission-approves-wetland-map-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Sabatini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Land Use and Zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2009/10/21/conversation-commission-approves-wetland-map-amendment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vincent F. Sabatini an attorney with Sabatini and Associates, LLC represented the potential buyer of a 3.5 acre parcel of land located in Newington, CT. The client wanted to develop the land. However the town&#8217;s wetlands map showed that most of the parcel was wetlands. A soils expert was retained to conduct a survey of the land to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vincent F. Sabatini an attorney with Sabatini and Associates, LLC represented the potential buyer of a 3.5 acre parcel of land located in Newington, CT. The client wanted to develop the land. However the town&#8217;s wetlands map showed that most of the parcel was wetlands. A soils expert was retained to conduct a survey of the land to determine if the town&#8217;s wetland map was accurrate.  The soil expert determined that the map was not correct. Based on the report, an application was submitted to the town&#8217;s Conservation Commission. This commission has jurisdiction over wetlands. The application requested the commision to amend the wetland line to conform to the soils report. After public hearing the application was approved. The wetlands line was moved allowing the land to be developed.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2009/10/21/conversation-commission-approves-wetland-map-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zoning Regulation Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2009/10/21/zoning-regulation-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2009/10/21/zoning-regulation-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Sabatini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2009/10/21/zoning-regulation-amendment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sabatini and Associates, LLC represented a religious sect which desired to have its clergy reside on the premises where the temple was located. A review of the local zoning ordinances in Newington, CT, revealed that the regulations did not contain any reference to housing for religious clerics. A survey of various religious institutions in Newington revealed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sabatini and Associates, LLC represented a religious sect which desired to have its clergy reside on the premises where the temple was located. A review of the local zoning ordinances in Newington, CT, revealed that the regulations did not contain any reference to housing for religious clerics. A survey of various religious institutions in Newington revealed that despite the lack of regulations permitting housing for religious clerics, many were in existience. Sabatini and Asociates, LLC attorney Vincent F. Sabatini drafted an amendment to the zoing regulations which would allow places of worship to have clerics reside on the same premises as the place of worship. The application for an amendment was filed and after public hearing the Plan and Zoning Commission unamiounisly approved the same. The regulation is now in effect.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sabatinilaw.com/Blog/2009/10/21/zoning-regulation-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

