Archive for April, 2007

Independent Contractor vs. Employee

Friday, April 13th, 2007

The courts have considered many facts in deciding

whether a worker is an independent contractor or an

employee. These relevant facts fall into three main

categories: behavioral control; financial control; and

relationship of the parties. In each case, it is very

important to consider all the facts – no single fact

provides the answer. Carefully review the following

definitions.

BEHAVIORAL CONTROL

These facts show whether there is a right to direct or

control how the worker does the work. A worker is an

employee when the business has the right to direct and

control the worker. The business does not have to

actually direct or control the way the work is done – as

long as the employer has the right to direct and control

the work. For example:

 Instructions if you receive extensive

instructions on how work is to be done, this

suggests that you are an employee. Instructions

can cover a wide range of topics, for example:

 how, when, or where to do the work

 what tools or equipment to use

 what assistants to hire to help with

the work

 where to purchase supplies and

services

If you receive less extensive instructions about

what should be done, but not how it should be

done, you may be an independent contractor.

For instance, instructions about time and place

may be less important than directions on how the

work is performed

 Training – if the business provides you

with training about required procedures

and methods, this indicates that the business

wants the work done in a certain way, and

this suggests that you may be an employee.

FINANCIAL CONTROL

These facts show whether there is a right to direct or

control the business part of the work. For example:

 if you have a

significant investment in your work, you may bean independent contractor. While there

is no precise dollar test, the investment must have

substance. However, a significant investment is

not necessary to be an independent contractor.

Expenses

– if you are not reimbursed for some

or all business expenses, then you may be an

independent contractor, especially

if your unreimbursed business expenses are high.

 Opportunity for Profit or Loss – if

you can realize a profit or incur a loss, this

suggests that you are in business for yourself and

that you may be an independent contractor.

RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES

These are facts that illustrate how the business and the

worker perceive their relationship. For example:

 Employee Benefits – if you receive benefits,

such as insurance, pension, or paid

leave, this is an indication that you may be an

employee. If you do not receive benefits,

however, you could be either an employee or an

independent contractor.

WRITTEN CONTRACT

– a written contract

may show what both you and the business

intend. This may be very significant if it is

difficult, if not impossible, to determine

status based on other facts.

Woman Killed in Car Accident on I-91N in Hartford

Wednesday, April 11th, 2007

A 43-year-old woman was killed in a two-car accident on I-91 northbound Tuesday around 9:30 p.m., state police said.  Sheila Ruff, of 27 Charter Oak Place, suffered multiple blunt trauma when she was rear-ended by Zhong Chen near exit 29, state police said.  Given the the loss of life from this accident, the state police accident reconstructionists are investigating and will issue a report that should fully explain how and why this tragic car accident took place.

Proposed CT Legislation to Prohibit Abusive Workplace Conduct

Wednesday, April 4th, 2007

The Connecticut legislature is working on a bill aimed at eliminating on-the-job harassment. If passed into
law, the new legislation would prohibit abusive workplace conduct,
including, but not limited to:

(A) repeated infliction of verbal abuse such as the use of derogatory
remarks, insults and epithets;

(B) verbal or physical conduct that a reasonable person would find
threatening, intimidating or humiliating; and

(C) sabotaging or undermining a person’s work performance.

Unlike existing State and federal laws, the bill is not limited to
harassment based upon protected characteristics such as race, gender, age or
disability. The bill creates a private right of action for employees, and
prohibits retaliation against employees reporting abuse. Employers would
face potential liability for exposing employees to abusive situations or
failing to exercise reasonable care to correct and prevent known abuse.

Employers may be required to remove the alleged bully
from the work area and compensate the victim for back pay, front pay,
medical expenses, and emotional distress. The court may even assess punitive
damages and attorneys fees.

Employers may avoid liability for any alleged violation of this
provision if the employer is: (1) acting with reasonable care to correct and
prevent bullying; (2) making employment decisions based on legitimate
business interests; or (3) conducting investigations into possible illegal
or unethical behavior.

This legislation, if passed, will create new legal protection for employees that are subjected to verbal abuse or physically threatening behavior at the workplace.  This legislation is needed.  Presently, therre is little to no legal protection afforded to employees being subjected to verbal abuse or physical threats that are non-discriminatory in nature (i.e. verbal use or threats based upon race, gender, religion, national origina, sexual orientation, disability, or age).  The common law also affords little to no legal protection.  Hopefully, this legislation will be passed.  The status of the legislation will be followed.